Volume-Outcome Relationship of Resternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: We assessed volume-outcome relationships of resternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We studied 1,362,218 first-time CABG and 93,985 resternotomy CABG patients reported to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and mortality and morbidity (M&M) rates calculated per hospital and per surgeon. Outcomes were compared across 6 total cardiac surgery volume categories. Multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models were used considering continuous case volume as the main exposure, adjusting for patient characteristics and within-surgeon and hospital variation. RESULTS: We observed a decline in resternotomy CABG unadjusted mortality and M&M from the lowest to the highest case-volume categories (hospital-level mortality, 3.9% ± 0.6% to 3.3% ± 0.1%; M&M, 18.5% ± 1.1% to 15.7% ± 0.4%, P < .001; surgeon-level mortality, 4.1% ± 0.3% to 4.1% ± 1.3%; M&M, 18.5% ± 0.6% to 14.5% ± 2.2%, P < .001). Looking at outcomes vs continuous volume showed that beyond a minimum annual volume (hospital 200-300 cases; surgeon 100-150 cases, approximately), mortality and M&M rates did not further improve. Using individual-level data and adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within surgeon and hospital, we found higher procedural volume was associated with improved surgeon-level outcomes (mortality adjusted odds ratio, 0.39/100 procedures; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; M&M adjusted odds ratio, 0.37/100 procedures; 95% CI, 0.28-0.48; P < .001 for both). Hospital-level adjusted volume-outcomes associations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an inverse relationship between total cardiac case volume and resternotomy CABG outcomes at the surgeon level only, indicating that individual surgeon's experience, rather than institutional volume, is the key determinant.

Resternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass 1999-2018: Insights From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: We sought to quantify the risk trend of resternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over the past 2 decades. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 194 804 consecutive resternotomy CABG patients and 1 445 894 randomly selected first-time CABG patients (50% of total) reported to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 1999 and 2018. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and overall morbidity. Using multiple logistic regression for each outcome for each year, we computed the annual trends of risk-adjusted odds ratios for the primary outcomes in the entire cohort and in 194 776 propensity-matched pairs. RESULTS: The annual resternotomy CABG case volume from participating centers declined by 68%, from a median of 25 (range, 14-44) to a median of 8 (range, 4-15). Compared with first-time CABG, resternotomy CABG patients were consistently older, with higher proportions of comorbidities. After propensity matching, primary outcomes of resternotomy and first-time CABG were similar (mortality: 3.5% vs 2.3%, standardized difference [SDiff], 7.5%; morbidity: 40.7% vs 40.3%, SDiff, 0.9%). Mortality of resternotomy CABG performed after prior CABG was higher than that after prior non-CABG (4.3% vs 2.4%; SDiff, 10.8). Morbidity was similar between these subgroups (41.0% vs 39.1%; SDiff, 2.9). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality after resternotomy CABG declined from 1.93 (95% CI, 1.73-2.16) to 1.22 (95% CI, 0.92-1.62), and that of morbidity declined from 1.13 (95% CI, 1.08-1.18) to 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95), P < .001 for both. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of resternotomy CABG has decreased substantially over time. Resternotomy CABG performed after a prior CABG is higher risk compared with that performed after a non-CABG operation.

Primary cardiac sarcomas: Treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Our multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team now has an experience of operating on 122 cases of primary cardiac sarcoma over a 23-year period. The purpose of this study is to present our short- and long-term outcomes for cardiac sarcoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected Institutional Review Board-approved cardiac tumor database for cardiac sarcoma. Patient characteristics, surgical factors, and patient outcomes were analyzed. Perioperative data were collected from direct patient communication and all available medical records. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years from the time of our surgery and 1, 3, and 5 years from the initial diagnosis. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality between the first and second halves of the study. RESULTS: From October 1998 to April 2021, we operated on 122 patients with a primary cardiac sarcoma. The mean age was 45.3 years old, and 52.5% were male. Tumors were most frequently found in the left atrium (40.2%) and right atrium (32.0%). The most common type of tumor histologically was an angiosarcoma (38.5%), followed by high-grade sarcoma (14.8%). Survival from initial diagnosis at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88.4%, 43.15%, and 27.8%, respectively. Survival from surgery at our institution at 1 and 3 years was 57.1% and 24.5%, respectively. When comparing outcomes from different time periods, we found no significant difference in survival between the previous era (1998-2011) and the current era (2011-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Management of these complex patients can show reasonable outcomes in centers with a multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team. Mortality has not improved with time and is likely related to the systemic nature of this disease.

Validation of the society of thoracic surgeons predicted risk of mortality score for long-term survival after cardiac surgery in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival is an important metric in assessing procedural value. We previously confirmed that the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score (PROM) accurately predicts 30-day mortality in Israeli patients. The present study investigated the ability of the PROM to reliably predict long-term survival. METHODS: Data on 1279 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively entered into our database and used to calculate PROM. Long-term mortality was obtained from the Israeli Social Security Database. Patients were stratified into five cohorts according to PROM (A: 0-0.99%, B: 1.0-1.99%, C: 2.0-2.99%, D: 3.0-4.99% and E: ≥ 5.0%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were calculated for each cohort and compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We used C-statistics to assess model discrimination. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of long-term survival. RESULTS: Follow-up was achieved for 1256 (98%) patients over a mean period of 62 ± 28 months (median 64, range 0-107). Mean survival of the entire cohort was 95 ± 1 (95% CI 93-96) months. Higher PROM was associated with reduced survival: A-104 ± 1 (103-105) months, B-96 ± 2 (93-99) months, C-93 ± 3 (88-98) months, D-89 ± 3 (84-94) months, E-74 ± 3 (68-80) months (p < 0.0001). The Area Under the Curve was 0.76 ± 0.02 indicating excellent model discrimination. Independent predictors of long-term mortality included advanced age, lower ejection fraction, reoperation, diabetes mellitus, dialysis and PROM. CONCLUSIONS: The PROM was a reliable predictor of long-term survival in Israeli patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The PROM might be a useful metric for assessing procedural value and surgical decision-making.

Right-Sided Cardiac Calcifying Fibrous Pseudotumor Manifesting With Embolic Stroke.

This report describes the case of a 43-year-old woman with a right-sided cardiac calcifying fibrous pseudotumor who presented with embolic stroke. This rare clinicopathologic entity should be included in the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. Tissue diagnosis should be pursued. Management should be tailored to symptoms and feasibility of resection.

Global perspectives on cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training.

OBJECTIVE: Various methods for cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training exist across the globe, with the common goal of producing safe, independent surgeons. A comparative analysis of international training paradigms has not been undertaken, and our goal in doing so was to offer insights into how to best prepare future trainees and ensure the health of our specialty. METHODS: We performed a comparative analysis of available publications offering detailed descriptions of various cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training paradigms. Corresponding authors from previous publications and other international collaborators were also reached directly for further data acquisition. RESULTS: We report various approaches to common challenges surrounding (1) selection of trainees and plans for the future surgical workforce; (2) trainee assessments and certification of competency before independent practice; and (3) challenges related to a changing practice landscape. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiothoracic surgery remains a dynamic and rewarding specialty. Current and future trainees face several challenges that transcend national borders. To foster collaboration and adoption of best practices, we highlight international strengths and weaknesses of various nations in terms of workforce selection, trainee operative experience and assessment, board certification, and preparation for future changes anticipated in cardiothoracic surgery.

The American Society of Thoracic Surgery Score versus EuroSCORE I and EuroSCORE II in Israeli Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recently, Israel established the first national-level adult cardiac surgery database, which was linked to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare the STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) to logistic EuroSCORE I (LESI) and EuroSCORE II (ESII) in Israeli patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 1279 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgeries with a calculable PROM. Data were prospectively entered into our database and used to calculate PROM, LESI, and ESII. Scores were normalized and correlated using linear regression and Pearson's test. To examine model calibration, we plotted the total observed versus expected mortality for each score and across five risk-score subgroups. Model discrimination was assessed by measuring the area under the receiver operating curves. RESULTS: The observed 30-day operative mortality was 1.95%. The median (IQ1; IQ3) PROM, LESI, and the ESII scores were 1.45% (0.69; 3.22), 4.54% (2.28; 9.27), and 1.88% (1.18; 3.54), respectively, with observed over expected ratios of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.42-0.93), 0.59 (95%CI 0.40-0.87), and 0.24 (95%CI 0.17-0.36), respectively, (STS vs. ESII P = 0.36, STS vs. LESI P = 0.0001). There was good correlation among all scores. All models overestimated mortality. Model discrimination was high and similar for all three scores. Model calibration of the STS, PROM, and ESII were more accurate than the LESI, particularly in higher risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: All scores overestimated mortality. In Israeli patients, the STS, PROM, and ESII risk-scores were more reliable metrics than LESI, particularly in higher risk patients.

Surgical Treatment of Palestinian Patients With Congenital Heart Disease in a Medical Center in Israel: Challenges and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of congenital heart disease patients in the West Bank and Gaza involves both medical and political challenges. Understanding the difficulties faced in treating the Palestinian population is an important step to improving surgical care, better allocating resources and overcoming the region's unique problems. METHODS: The Hadassah Medical Center congenital heart disease database over the 2011-2017 period was analyzed. There were 872 operations performed in patients with Israeli health insurance and 207 operations in Palestinian patients. Patient characteristics and surgical outcome were compared between the two groups using standard statistical practices. FINDINGS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Complexity Scores were significantly higher in the Palestinian patients, p = 0.003 (d = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.42). Israeli neonates had surgery at an average age of 9.5 ±â€¯7.8 days as compared to Palestinian neonates with an average age of 15.7 ±â€¯8.2 days, p < 0.001 (d = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.15), a finding indicative of a possible delay of treatment. Overall in hospital mortality was not significantly different. Late mortality was significantly higher for the Palestinian 5.4% (9/168) compared to Israeli patients 2% (14/698), p = 0.015 (RR = 2.67, 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.07). INTERPRETATION: The findings suggest that Palestinian patients receive later treatment and poorer follow-up care than Israeli patients. Despite the political challenges in the region surgical results are excellent and comparable between the two groups. The challenges described are not unique to congenital heart disease and may affect many medical fields. We believe that extensive collaborations between Israeli and Palestinian physicians may be key to improving the Palestinian medical care. FUNDING: None.

Endovascular brachytherapy for extensive right-heart and pulmonary artery sarcoma - a case report.

PURPOSE: Primary sarcoma of the heart is a rare but devastating tumor. Median survival with conventional treatment is 8-12 months. When resection is not feasible, patients often succumb to heart failure secondary to obstruction of blood flow, valve dysfunction, chamber compression or conduction abnormalities. Palliative treatment options include systemic chemotherapy and external beam irradiation. We herein describe a novel technique using endovascular brachytherapy, aiming at reducing tumor mass, alleviating right ventricular pressure overload and at the same time keeping the option of R0 resection viable. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 35-year-old man was diagnosed with a non-resectable high-grade intimal sarcoma of the right ventricle (RV), main pulmonary artery (PA) and right PA. After three cycles of doxorubicin and ifosfamide, the patient's symptoms of right heart failure worsened. Imaging documented tumor progression and supra-systemic pulmonary artery pressure. Through a trans-femoral venous access, a brachytherapy sleeve was placed in the RV and main and right PA. A dose of 20 Gy was delivered over a period of ten minutes. RESULTS: The patient had an uneventful course and was discharged home 24 hours after the procedure. Ten months after brachytherapy, repeat imaging demonstrated a significant reduction in tumor volume and an increase in pulmonary artery cross-sectional area with a marked reduction of pulmonary artery pressure, leading to a complete resolution of heart failure symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular brachytherapy is a novel, safe and effective therapeutic modality for non-resectable primary cardiac sarcomas either for palliation of obstruction, or tumor mass reduction to allow complete resection.

Surgery for Tumors of the Heart.

Most surgeons will encounter only a handful of primary cardiac tumors outside of myxomas. Approximately 3 quarters of primary cardiac tumors are benign and 1 quarter is malignant. In most cases, cardiac tumors are silent but when symptoms do occur, they are primarily determined by tumor size and anatomical location, not by histopathology. The diagnosis and preoperative imaging relies heavily on multimodal imaging including echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and coronary angiography. Surgical resection is the most common treatment for most simple primary cardiac tumors and for some complex benign tumors. Surgical resection of primary cardiac tumors frequently involves the need for complex cardiac reconstruction, particularly when malignant. Secondary tumors to the heart are 30 times more frequent than primary cardiac tumors, and their incidence is increasing, largely as a result of advances in cancer diagnosis and therapy. Surgical resection is feasible in only a small fraction of highly-selected patients with secondary tumors to the heart. For complex benign tumors-such as paraganglioma or large fibromas-and all primary and secondary malignant tumors, a multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team review in experienced centers of excellence is recommended.